Commentary

David Weisberger
Traders Magazine Online News

Stop the BS & Promote Real Transparency!

In this shared blog, David Weisberger says a recent WSJ article is wrong and that traders do need to purchase faster and more comprehensive market data to avoid being fined for violating "Best Execution" obligations.

Traders Poll

Is information leakage a major concern of yours when you trade?



Free Site Registration

March 1, 2014

Nasdaq to Cut Costs

By John D'Antona Jr.

Nasdaq is on the precipice of changing the way some of its biggest customers trade on the bourse.

The exchange operator has announced a plan to cut the fees it charges some of its biggest customers, according to a report by Reuters. The attempted move has proven controversial, sparking cries of outrage from both rivals and regulators.

Last October, Nasdaq told U.S. regulators it wanted to offer cheaper trading for customers of one of its options exchanges, if their total volume of trading with all three of Nasdaq's options exchanges was substantial.

The Securities and Exchange Commission put the proposal on hold in November and asked for comment on the proposal.

If approved, Reuters reported, the Nasdaq plan could have far-reaching effects on competition, pricing and complexity in options and stock markets. Rivals claim it would end a level playing field by favoring larger exchange companies that run a number of different marketplaces over smaller players.

Nasdaq declined comment but has said the proposal was pro-competition.

 

(c) 2014 Traders Magazine and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.tradersmagazine.com http://www.sourcemedia.com/