(Bloomberg) — Deeb Salem, a former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. trader who said he helped the bank earn more than $7 billion, wants to be paid the almost $5 million difference between his 2010 bonus and what he told his mother to expect.
Salem said in an arbitration hearing that he was led to believe that his 2010 bonus would be $13 million, down from a $15 million award for 2009 when he was paid more than Chief Executive Officer Lloyd C. Blankfein. Instead, Salem said his bonus was unfairly docked because of a written warning he received about his 2007 self-evaluation.
Salem, 35, said the $8.25 million bonus for 2010 didnt reflect his contributions, while Goldman Sachs argued he was aware that the firm could pay him whatever it wished and that the company considered his conduct in determining compensation. Salem said promises from executives kept him around for another year before a $3 million bonus led him to jump to a hedge fund.
Lets be very clear: I was one of the most sought-after investment professionals in the mortgage industry, Salem said during the Feb. 25 hearing. I had the opportunity throughout the course of my career and throughout — from that day, from almost every month that I was at Goldman, to leave for other opportunities.
A transcript of Salems arbitration hearing before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority was included as an exhibit to his petition filed last week in New York State Supreme Court. The document was no longer available on the courts website yesterday after Goldman Sachs filed a motion to seal the petition and parts of related exhibits.
A copy of the transcript was provided by Salems lawyer and couldnt be immediately verified in court filings. Oral arguments on Goldman Sachss motion to seal the documents have been scheduled for September, court filings show.
These claims are utterly ridiculous, which is why they were rejected by a Finra panel, and unworthy of any further response, said Tiffany Galvin, a spokeswoman for New York- based Goldman Sachs.
Salem asked the court to throw out the arbitrators ruling against him in part because he said they showed bias and one member of the panel called his case bulls— during the hearing.
While Wall Street banks tout the flexibility that year-end bonuses gives to their expense line, employees often expect pay to closely track what they produce. Blankfein has said he would make discretionary bonuses 100 percent of compensation if he could.
Salem sought a total of more than $16 million in additional pay from Goldman Sachs in arbitration. That included almost $7 million in deferred stock that Salem said he was led to believe he would get as long as his exit from the company wasnt akin to the departure of Greg Smith, who announced it in a New York Times op-ed that criticized how the firm treated clients.
In January 2011, Salem told his mother, who was staying with him because her house had burned down on Christmas, that he expected at least $13 million for 2010, according to the transcript. That was based on the fact that his mortgage-trading desk generated about the same amount of revenue in 2010 as it did the previous year and that Justin Gmelich, a credit trading executive, told him at a cocktail hour that he was a steal at $15 million, Salem said.
Salem received an $8.25 million bonus after getting the warning for extremely poor judgment in discussing a short squeeze in his self-evaluation. Goldman Sachs executives told him the firm would make it up to him and encouraged him to stay, he said. That came after President Gary Cohn persuaded him to remain in 2008 rather than leave with colleague Josh Birnbaum to start a hedge fund, Salem said.
No promises were made, Andrew Frackman, a lawyer at OMelveny & Myers LLP who represented Goldman Sachs, said at the hearing. The companys policy clearly states that all bonuses are discretionary and Salem acknowledged as much when he signed the firms employment offer, Frackman said.
Salem said his group put on a large short bet against the housing market, reaping billions of dollars for Goldman Sachs and helping it weather the financial crisis better than peers. He said Blankfein told the desk to cover its bet in early 2007, forcing the group to sell almost $5 billion of positions to Harbinger Capital Partners LLC, the hedge-fund firm run by Phil Falcone that made billions betting against subprime mortgages.
While the move cost the group profits, it once again went short in the middle of 2007, generating gains of $2 billion to $3 billion, Salem said. The group made almost $2 billion in 2008 and then changed its view of the market to positive in 2009 and 2010, reaping more than $1 billion in each of those years, he said.
Salem said he and other traders in his group didnt mind getting paid a lower percentage of their produced revenue than other parts of the firm. Salem said he did find it a little bit insulting that Jeff Verschleiser, a trading executive who was hired from Bear Stearns Cos. in 2008, kept a box of toaster ovens at his desk that he would award to employees who made notable trades.
Verschleiser and Gmelich didnt respond to phone messages seeking comment.
Frackman said that while there is no dispute that he is very good at trading, Salem was paid better than peers. He was awarded more than $35 million in pay over six years and was the second-best-paid managing director in the mortgage department in 2009 and 2010, and third-best in 2011, Frackman said.
He made a ton of money, Frackman said at the hearing. Hes not entitled to more simply because he would like to have been paid more. If that were the case, youd have traders and bankers in here every day of the week.
In 2011, the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said Salem and other Goldman Sachs traders tried to manipulate prices of derivatives linked to subprime home loans in 2007 for their own benefit. The subcommittees assertions were based in part on Salems self-evaluation, in which he wrote we began to encourage the squeeze with plans of getting very short again after the short squeeze caused capitulation of these shorts.
Goldman Sachs denied any attempted manipulation.
The translation of that sentence is, you know — is very different than it was, at times, made out to be, Salem said at the hearing. Theres no wrongdoing in that sentence.
Salems lawyer, Jonathan Sack of Sack & Sack, said in an interview that his client was scapegoated as other executives who were criticized by the Senate went unpunished.
While Salems claim originally sought more than $20 million of unpaid compensation, Sack said in the hearing his client was now seeking $9.5 million plus 41,000 shares of deferred compensation, worth about $7 million at yesterdays closing price. Frackman said the numbers were pulled out of a hat.
Salem left for hedge-fund firm GoldenTree Asset Management LP in 2012 after his 2011 bonus fell to $3 million. His group made $260 million in a difficult market that year, he said.
Everyone at Goldman took a beating in 2011 because it was a terrible year for the firm, Frackman said.
Salem said he expected to receive unvested shares from previous years bonuses after a conversation he had with Michael Swenson, a senior trader whom Salem described as a father figure. According to Salems account, Swenson told him that if he left the firm, there would be at least one positive consequence from Smiths public resignation: You are guaranteed, basically, to get your deferred compensation.
–With assistance from Max Abelson in New York and Chris Dolmetsch in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan.