CFTC Opens Probe Into Fees Charged by Managed Futures Funds

Fees, commissions and expenses in managed futures funds often cost customers a large majority -- or all -- of their gains, says the SEC.

  • (Bloomberg) —The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is investigating the high fees charged to investors in the $337 billion managed futures market.

    CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton said the agency initiated the inquiry after Bloomberg Markets magazine reported in its November issue that 89 percent of the $11.5 billion of profits of 63 managed futures funds was consumed by commissions, fees and expenses.

    The CFTC probe comes as a U.S. Senate committee yesterday sent a letter urging the agency to work with the Securities and Exchange Commission to study ways to provide clearer disclosure of high fees charged to retirement accounts invested in managed futures funds.

    Chilton, one of four CFTC commissioners, said regulators should require managed futures fund managers to be more transparent about the cumulative effect of fees on investors over time.

    Fees, commissions and expenses in managed futures funds often cost customers a large majority — or all — of their gains, according to filings with the SEC. Some managed futures funds charge as much as 9 percent of assets annually.

    Chilton, a Democrat who has planned to step down by the end of 2013, said he may stay longer. President Barack Obama hasnt nominated Chiltons replacement. The commission, which is supposed to have five members, could be down to just two, Democrat Mark Wetjen and Republican Scott OMalia, if Chilton departs. Republican Jill Sommers left in July and Genslers term expires at the end of the year.

    Once started, a probe continues, even if a commissioner steps down, Chilton said.

    The CFTC has the authority to demand confidential information from the industry without subpoenas.

    Steve Hinkson, a spokesman for the Managed Funds Association trade group in Washington, declined to comment on the probe, saying the group doesnt comment on regulatory inquiries.

    Managed futures funds buy and sell contracts to speculate on up and down price moves in stock indexes, interest rates, currencies, metals, oil, natural gas and more.

    ISE Bid for S&P, Dow Jones Indexes Rejected by U.S. Judge

International Securities Exchange Holdings Inc. lost a second lawsuit over the Chicago Board Options Exchanges exclusive license to list options based on the Standard & Poors 500 and Dow Jones indexes.

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in Manhattan on Dec. 19 threw out the case, citing ISEs loss of what he called an identical lawsuit in Illinois state courts, where the company was a defendant.

After bringing a federal case in New York and leaving it dormant for almost seven years, ISE and its co-defendant in the Illinois suit were now trying to re-litigate the same issues in his court, which they are barred from doing, Hellerstein said.

S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, the winning defendant in the Dec. 19 ruling, owns benchmarks such as the S&P 500 Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average, which track the value of trillions of dollars in assets. The New York-based firm licenses rights to companies that want to create financial instruments linked to those indexes.

CBOE Holdings Inc., owner of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, has exclusive rights through 2018 to offer options on the S&P 500 and S&P 100.

That means Deutsche Boerse AGs International Securities Exchange, which runs one of the biggest U.S. options markets, is barred from expanding into a potentially lucrative business. S&P 500 options are CBOEs biggest product by revenue, according to its last annual report.

We are very disappointed by the judges decision and have no further comment at this time, Molly McGregor, an ISE spokeswoman, said in an e-mailed statement.

CBOE Holdings sued ISE in Illinois in 2006 to block it from providing a forum for trading the index options.

Judge William O. Maki in Chicago barred ISE from featuring the listings in July 2010, ruling that the CBOE had an exclusive license to offer options based on the S&P 500.

His decision was upheld by an Illinois appellate court. The U.S. Supreme Court denied New York-based ISEs bid for an appeal.