Group Co.
Why We Need Compromise on Market Data
Traders Magazine Online News, November 5, 2018
Sparks flew at the recent Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) roundtable in Washington DC as regulators attempted to drag exchanges and market makers to a compromise over the long-running controversy of market data fees. The SEC recently ruled that the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq had not justified the price they charge for market data. That ruling has kicked off a new round of the century-old debate.
The global revenue for exchanges who sell data to market makers reached a staggering $30bn last year, up 8% on 2016. This has been driven by the cost of the data they provide, which increased by 20% year-on-year between 2011 and 2016. SEC Commissioner, Jay Clayton, also rebuked exchanges for the conflict of interest in their dual role as a regulatory body and a for-profit company.
Traders argue the data they receive from exchanges is essential to their business and the operation of markets. They also argue that exchanges have abused their monopoly position to drive a surge in the cost of the data, which for many firms has become their second largest expenditure after payroll. But data sales are now an important revenue stream for stock exchanges as competition and regulatory change has squeezed their profit margins. The New York Stock Exchange, for its part, has said the October 16th SEC decision “represents the latest in a 20-year-long series of attempts to over regulate the best capital markets in the world, in order to benefit the largest financial institutions.”
But the SEC’s decision does not necessarily mean that fees were too high, rather the exchanges had not adequately justified the prices they were charging. The two-day roundtable marked an attempt by the SEC to bring the players closer to agreement on a way forward, but it proved a tense meeting fraught with seemingly intractable positions.
Currently, there are two systems available to obtain market data. The basic service is the Securities Information Processor (SIPs) which consolidates the best bids, offers and details of executed trades on the exchanges. But exchanges can also sell ‘proprietary’ data (company data controlled to safeguard competitive edge) to give a more complete picture of market supply and demand.
Traders argue in the modern and fast-paced marketplace they need this proprietary data to stay competitive. Despite the protestations to the contrary by exchanges, the feeling is that the SIP data sources cost too much. Further, many accuse exchanges of deliberately starving SIP systems of data to increase the need – and therefore value – of the proprietary feeds. Just three companies control the 13 major exchanges in the U.S., and as brokers are obliged by regulators to execute the best trades possible, this leaves them little choice but to pay the maximum.
For more information on related topics, visit the following channels:
Comments (0)