Free Site Registration

Spotify Puts Wall Street’s Old Ways on the Spot

Traders Magazine Online News, March 22, 2018

Don Ross

From research to market making, Wall Street has been feeling the heat from investors, regulators, and technology.  As middlemen go, Wall Street has—at least the biggest firms among them—held up reasonably well under the pressure to cut costs and validate services.  Yet recent reports that music streaming giant Spotify would go public with a direct listing, cutting out much of the usual Wall Street hand-holding that comes with hefty underwriting fees, show that even firms flush with cash are reluctant to pay for floaties if they can swim on their own in the listings market.

Spotify is being frugal with its owners’ cash, but it’s still not exactly going Dutch—as in the Dutch auction initial public offering (IPO) that Google used when it made its exchange debut back in 2004.  Instead, it will pay its three advisers—Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Allen & Co.—roughly $30 million to coordinate the selling of existing owners’ shares to new owners in order to reduce the risk of a wild debut when the stock opens on the exchanges.  But this raises the question of why they are going half way.

Firms without a major public profile have reason to pay up so that Wall Street will spread the gospel on their business model and prospects.  This typically ensures that the stock comes to market modestly under-priced, producing enough of a quick bounce to reward risk-taking first buyers—those that didn’t have a solid basis for pricing it.  But household names like Google don’t need preachers to spread the good news.  They can save tens of millions of dollars by just letting a computer set the opening price on the simple basis of revealed supply and demand.  This is the Dutch auction model.

This model is already being used for trading in the secondary market, after stocks are listed.  Auctions bring buyers and sellers together—without costly middlemen, and without leaking information—in an environment that prevents manipulation or gaming by one party or another.  The benefit is transactions dozens or hundreds of times larger than those on the exchanges, saving investors money.  Auctions are particularly useful for small- and mid-cap stocks, which tend to be illiquid and volatile on the exchanges.  So why can’t they improve performance in the primary markets, for IPOs, as well?

For more information on related topics, visit the following channels:

Comments (0)

Add Your Comments:

You must be registered to post a comment.

Not Registered? Click here to register.

Already registered? Log in here.

Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.