Commentary

David Weisberger
Traders Magazine Online News

Stop the BS & Promote Real Transparency!

In this shared blog, David Weisberger says a recent WSJ article is wrong and that traders do need to purchase faster and more comprehensive market data to avoid being fined for violating "Best Execution" obligations.

Traders Poll

Is information leakage a major concern of yours when you trade?



Free Site Registration

Debate Rages Over CAT Real-Time Reporting

One thing participants are sure to discuss at this year's STA Conference is whether or not the consolidated audit trail proposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission should include real-time reporting.

Much of the industry remains firmly opposed to real-time reporting for CAT, but regulators continue to hint that a real-time component might still be included when the SEC rolls out its CAT proposal in the next few months.

At a conference hosted by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, David Shillman, associate director of the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets, called CAT the agency's "number one" priority.

While a real-time reporting requirement would mean extensive technology upgrades, he said it could still be feasible.

"If a real-time audit trail were approved by the Commission, monitoring technologies could be developed," Shillman said.

At the same conference, Gregg Berman, senior adviser to the director of the Division of Trading and Markets, was even more enthusiastic. He said the SEC had reached out for information regarding the availability of real-time tools and found the necessary technology for monitoring is available.

"We were quite pleased to find that it is possible for us to procure systems, databases and applications that will enable us to read, monitor and analyze the same low-latency trade-and-quote feeds that many of the most sophisticated market participants use today," Berman said.

Such systems would allow the SEC to observe every trade, every quote and every cancel, at just about the same time and in the same way that other market participants do, according to Berman. He said that while markets are complex, they are not inscrutable.

Others are not so sure real-time reporting would be a good idea. Many in the industry feel it would be excessively expensive and would add little value for regulators, since illegal market activity probably could not be identified until after the fact anyway.

Some in the industry feel it would be impossible to spot in real time any activity not so egregious that it would be caught today anyway.

"Real time is the worst time," said Chris Concannon, a partner with electronic trading firm Virtu Financial and former head of U.S. transaction services at Nasdaq OMX. "In order to recognize manipulation, you have to look at patterns of activity over time."

Elizabeth King, counsel at Getco and former associate director of the SEC's Division of Trading and Markets, echoed Concannon, noting that an investigation is usually necessary once possible abuse is detected. "We don't understand the added benefit of a real-time audit trail," King said. "T+1 seems perfectly sufficient. The cost would be so much less. Any kind of investigation would not be done in real-time."

Many in the industry want the SEC to use the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's Order Audit Trail System, or OATS, as the basis for CAT. Some argue that OATS-which tracks an order from start to finish-is already 80 percent of the way there. Tom Gira, FINRA's executive vice president for market regulation, agrees.

"With OATS, there is a process of reporting and repairing," he said. "It gives us time to get that foundation of information. It makes sense to give firms time to get it right."