Group Co.
FLASHBACK FRIDAY: Keeping Pace
Traders Magazine Online News, February 1, 2019
Regulation – the one constant in an ever-changing market structure.
And it is prevalent in both the US and the Great North – where Traders Magazine turned its attention to for this Flashback Friday lookback. While many readers of Traders Magazine are US-based and trade US denominated securities that is not the only market observed. There is the inter-listed market shared by the North American countries and of course, the Great North that is Canada.
Canada’s market structure, while not as complex as its Southern cousin, is still complex and evolving like the US. Many of the same concerns are on Great North traders – access fees, rebates, as well as others.
Nick Savona, Chief Compliance Officer at Independent Trading Group, told Traders Magazine that one overriding initiative for the new Ontario Government (where ITG is domiciled) is deregulation and reducing red tape across the province in a number of industries.
“The OSC recently issued a notice seeking suggestions and comments on ways to further reduce unnecessary regulatory burden,” Savona said. “The (OSC) along with the Ministry of Finance, have established a Burden Reduction Task Force which I feel is going to be welcomed with open arms. The securities industry in Canada has made a significant effort over the last decade by moving to more Principles-based approach to regulation from a more Traditional approach. The intention of the regulatory amendments is not to lessen the requirements and expectations of compliance supervision, but rather to move away from a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Lessening the burden on market participants has and will continue to improve the framework to identify and address higher-risk areas and activities.”
Another hot topic are access fees. Just like in the US, the regulatory eye has turned to the fees brokers and are passed on to traders and as in the US are coming under intense scrutiny. The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) has recently formally announced it was publishing for comment a proposed Trading Fee Rebate Pilot Study that would apply temporary pricing restrictions on marketplace transaction fees applicable to trading in certain securities. The CSA is publishing the Proposed Pilot for a 45-day comment period to solicit views.
“We are seeking comment on all issues raised in this notice, including the design of the Proposed Pilot that is contained in the Design Report, as well as the specific questions raised within it,” the CSA wrote.
The CSA has been considering a pilot study on the payment of trading fee rebates for many years in relation to its continued work to foster fair and efficient capital markets and confidence in capital markets. On May 15, 2014, it originally published a Notice and Request for Comment that proposed amendments to National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules (NI 23-101) in relation to the order protection rule (OPR). Then on April 7, 2016, as a result of its review of OPR, CSA published a Notice of Approval of Amendments to NI 23-101 and Companion Policy 23-101CP (the 2016 Notice). They acknowledged that the regulator had been considering a pilot study for a number of years but, due to certain risks arising from the interconnected nature of North American markets and securities that are interlisted in the United States, it decided not to move forward with a pilot study unless a similar study was undertaken in the United States.
With the US pursuing an access fee pilot, so is Canada. And with vigor and serious intent. ITG recently reported the CSA has now extended the deadline for comments on the Trading Fee Rebate Pilot Study from February 1 to March 1, following objections by TMX Group that the comment period was too short.
“We believe Canadian regulators are eager to hear additional input on the pilot from institutional investors in particular,” ITG wrote in a weekly research note. “While the new deadline offers market participants more than ample time to opine, it may leave less time to actually implement the changes needed to comply with the pilot, if it is rolled out simultaneously with the pending U.S. Transaction Fee Pilot.”
The following article originally appeared in the January 2012 edition of Traders Magazine
FLASHBACK FRIDAY: Keeping Pace
Canadian Regulators Take Center Stage in 2012
By John D’Antona Jr.
In 2011, electronic trading and fragmentation drove the Canadian equities market into the 21st century-at least by U.S. standards. As a result, regulators will take center stage in the coming year to ensure the Great White North's markets stay accessible, secure and true to the Canadian spirit.
The Canadian markets caught up to their U.S. counterparts this past year, as new trading venues arrived there-such as Instinet's ICX and BLX dark pools and Goldman Sachs' Sigma X-more algorithms hit trading desks, and overall trading volume increased. The traditionally high-touch and big-bank-run marketplace has matured, and it now more closely mirrors that of its U.S. cousin.
According to market professionals, the Canadian market structure has raced ahead of regulation and control, leading to concerns about fair access, dark pools, high-frequency trading and gaming. Regulators are now tasked with catching up with advances in trading systems.
New order types are coming from both the public exchanges and alternative trading venues, which has led to a more fragmented marketplace. The Toronto has introduced TMX Dark, and Alpha ATS rolled out Intraspread, two new order types that sources said are attracting increased interest and volume. As these order types gain acceptance, liquidity has left either the upstairs market or other venues. For the Canadian buyside, it's a win-win, as they are mostly concerned with getting the best liquidity and price with a minimum of information leakage.
But not all are happy with more order types or venues.
"The common thought is that things are moving too fast here," said James Duncan, senior vice president and director of international trading at Canaccord Genuity and chair of the Canadian Security Traders Association. That is, many believe innovation is pushing forward unchecked and without a proper understanding of potential consequences.
Regulation, Duncan added, is needed beforehand to provide the framework to ensure a stable trading environment. "New order types shouldn't be driving changes in our market structure," he said. "Rather, market structure changes should be driving the need for new order types."
He added that many Canadian trading venues, like their U.S. counterparts, are trying to capture order flow without regard to the changing market structure. And that is a problem.
"We've lost sight of the big picture of how we should be dealing with the changing market structure and at the same time building confidence in the markets," Duncan said. "I don't want to see flickering orders of 100 shares at a time, guys just trying to capture spreads and rebates. Is this how we want our market structure to look?
Lida Preyma, director for capital markets research in global finance at the G20 Research Group at the University of Toronto, said that while market structure has indeed changed in Canada, regulators such as the Ontario Securities Commission and the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada aren't asleep at the regulatory wheel.
"It might appear that Canadian regulators have been slow to the uptake-but they are really being responsible and seeing what regulations come out of the U.S. and Europe first," she said.
Once the U.S. and European regulators examine and make policy, then Canadian regulators will carefully craft regulations that take into account the uniqueness of their own market. Also, they want to ensure they do not foster regulatory arbitrage.
"They are watching how their policies are going to coordinate in the global scheme and then act," Preyma said. "What we see is that everyone is in a holding pattern to see how regulation is going to wind up." For example, she said, future dark pool growth will likely be constrained until new regulations are formalized and published.
Several rules are on the drawing board already. One that has garnered attention is the minimum price and size requirement for orders placed in unlit venues.
The rule proposal, whose comment period has recently closed, suggested that a minimum size for passive dark orders should be no less than 5,000 shares or C$100,000 in value. Also, orders deemed small-less than 5,000 shares or C$100,000 in value-should only be allowed to interact with dark orders if they receive price improvement of at least one tick, or half a tick if the spread is only a single tick. The price improvement does not consider any maker/taker pricing economics, meaning the real price improvement might be considerably less.
Proponents of the rule are the major banks who traditionally handled most trading in the market and public exchanges. Critics, such as ATSs like Omega and Liquidnet, contend these new rules only look at child orders and not the entire parent order, so if an order is sent to several marketplaces, it is unclear to which order the rule should be applied.
This proposal has limited dark pool growth to just around 3 percent of total equity volume traded in Canada. In contrast, 13 percent of total equity trading in the U.S. occurs in dark pools.
Preyma also said regulators are finalizing rules concerning naked access, something Canada still allows. The rules, if passed, would prohibit naked access and require orders to go through a broker-dealer. The comment period closed in July, and she said a final rule could be published this winter.
A third rule, in the talking stage, deals with credit risk analysis, which could be part of the naked access rule. A potential rule could decide who is responsible for performing it and how it should be conducted.
"The beginning of 2012 promises more change, but I am hopeful for positive change," said Canaccord's Duncan. "We at the CSTA have regular meetings with our regulators, and we hope our feedback to them will be useful in restoring Canadian markets to the deep, liquid and stable markets that they should be."
(c) 2012 Traders Magazine and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.tradersmagazine.com http://www.sourcemedia.com/
For more information on related topics, visit the following channels:
Comments (0)