Q&A with BofA Merrill's Michael Lynch
Traders Magazine Online News, July 28, 2010
As the Securities and Exchange Commission continues to explore ways to evaluate the current market structure, Michael Lynch, head of execution services for the Americas at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, spoke with Traders Magazine about some of the issues concerning the markets and investors, as well as the future of electronic trading.
Michael Lynch, BofA Merrill
Traders Magazine: What is the biggest issue the desk is facing today?
Michael Lynch: The biggest issue for us is that there are so many things in flux from a regulatory perspective. We'd be encouraged if the SEC narrowed their focus to the most pressing issues. There are a number of open commentaries regarding May 6, plus the Concept Release, that need to be addressed.
TM: Can you give some examples?
ML: Sure, one example would be naked access. Or the debate about whether circuit breakers are really the right answer to what happened May 6.
TM: If there was one regulatory item that you would like to see get passed or addressed, what would it be?
ML: I think the single most important item I'd like to see addressed is naked access. Filtered access is the concept we have supported. We're not sure about the how naked or filtered access will play out, but unfiltered access could have some very negative impacts on the marketplace and is high on the risk charts in terms of what it could mean to the marketplace.
TM: What is the next big development in algorithmic or electronic trading?
ML: We have many new products that are coming through the pipeline, such as the Exchange Traded Funds algo--ETF aX. It's an algo that trades across asset classes to source liquidity at the best price. But the ETF algo is just the beginning. The exciting part is taking what we've learned in equity market and applying across other asset classes.
TM: What other asset classes?
ML: We want to take the same logic and algorithmic technology and bring it to futures, foreign exchange and then into Treasuries and interest rate swaps. Eventually--anything that trades on a screen. The goal is to bring algorithmic trading across the asset universe.
TM: How long could this take?
ML: While this will be a massive change for some of these markets, we don't think it will take the fixed income asset classes the same amount of time as the equities markets to get up to speed. They can take cue from equities. It's a natural progression--we're in the early stages trying to find solutions for clients and then measuring how effective they are. There's a good story here as the notional size of these markets and the business being done on the screens lends itself to the technology. There is a lot of start up technology vendors in the fixed income space already.
TM: There was a recent report from Tabb Group suggesting the volume of trades coming to a desk electronically will match those arriving via phone call. Do you see this trend developing?
ML: I think the blend between low-touch and high-touch trading depends on everything from market volume to volatility, clients' wallets and the demands placed on those wallets for goods and services. It can depend on client requests for capital, the new deal calendar, etc. There is no doubt the percentage of trading volume going electronic is a growth story, but I do not see it as a replacement of the high touch sales trader.
For more information on related topics, visit the following channels:
