Commentary

Joanna Fields
Traders Magazine Online News

Navigating Cybersecurity on a Stretch of "Regulatory Rapids"

In this shared commentary, Aplomb Strategies writes that when considering a firm’s governance structure, a holistic approach makes the most sense.

Traders Poll

Would you feel better if the Chicago Stock Exchange were purchased by U.S. firm or consortium rather than a foreign one?

Yes

73%

No

4%

Doesn't matter to me

23%

Free Site Registration

August 1, 2012

Debate On 'Playing Field' Heats Up

By Editorial Staff

Also in this article

  • Debate On 'Playing Field' Heats Up

Be careful what you wish for. Duncan Niederauer, chief executive of NYSE Euronext, one of the largest operators of stock exchanges, called on Congress in June to "level the playing field" between exchanges and brokers' alternative trading systems. According to Niederauer, exchanges such as those operated by NYSE Euronext are at a disadvantage to ATSs-with which they compete-because ATSs are more lightly regulated than exchanges. Niederauer was testifying at a hearing of the House Committee on Financial Services. He argued ATSs were similar to exchanges and therefore needed to be regulated like exchanges. That would eliminate any legal advantage they held.

Dan Mathisson, head of U.S. equity trading at Credit Suisse, operator of the industry's largest ATS, was also testifying at the hearing. Surprisingly, Mathisson agreed with Niederauer: ATSs are no different than exchanges and the playing field is not level. Mathisson, however, argued that the advantage is not with the ATSs, but with the exchanges. He told Congress the best way to level the playing field is to eliminate the restriction that limits broker-dealer ownership in an exchange to no more than 20 percent. If that is done then most of the ATSs would become exchanges and the playing field would be level, Mathisson said.

Niederauer offered three reasons why ATSs have an advantage over exchanges. Mathisson offered four reasons why exchanges have an advantage over ATSs. The excerpts below are from their written statements as well as their oral testimony.

Duncan Niederauer

Mr. Niederauer

ON THE LENGTHY SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION APPROVAL PROCESS

Regulatory inequality allows ATSs to innovate quickly without SEC approval, while exchanges must undergo a rigorous and lengthy regulatory review process to initiate change. They should make our rule proposals effective on filing or subject our competitors to our elongated approval processes.

ON FAIR ACCESS

Registered exchanges are required to have membership rules and procedures specifically designed to ensure access to exchange facilities is granted in a fair and impartial manner. The fair access requirements applicable to ATSs are far narrower. ATSs must comply with general fair access requirements only if a five percent trading volume threshold in an individual security is exceeded, and certain exceptions apply. NYX believes comparable fair access requirements should be applicable to all venues.

ON THE BURDEN OF MARKET SURVEILLANCE

Registered exchanges have self-regulatory responsibilities and must either maintain an extensive regulatory organization to conduct market surveillance or enter into a regulatory services agreement with another self-regulatory organization, either of which involve significant time and resources. Non-exchange trading venues are not subject to the same rules and are free from any self-regulatory requirements. We believe all market centers should share the same responsibilities and contribute to the cost of market surveillance based on their respective market shares.

Mr. Mathisson

ON EXCHANGE IMMUNITY