Commentary

David Weisberger
Traders Magazine Online News

Stop the BS & Promote Real Transparency!

In this shared blog, David Weisberger says a recent WSJ article is wrong and that traders do need to purchase faster and more comprehensive market data to avoid being fined for violating "Best Execution" obligations.

Traders Poll

Is information leakage a major concern of yours when you trade?



Free Site Registration

July 1, 2010

NYSE Stands By Its LRPs

By James Ramage

Also in this article

  • NYSE Stands By Its LRPs

Despite criticism, the New York Stock Exchange has vowed to continue its program for trading pauses.

Jose Marques

At the urging of the Securities and Exchange Commission, exchanges started to implement a marketwide, single-stock circuit breaker to cover names in the S&P 500 index on June 11. But the NYSE said it would continue to employ its own trading-pause program, called Liquidity Replenishment Points, in addition to the SEC-mandated circuit breaker.

LRP critics argue that the NYSE program intensifies, rather than moderates, volatility. They also say that LRPs contributed to the sudden disappearance of liquidity during the May 6 "flash crash."

The NYSE argues that LRPs are a beneficial component of the market structure. "We believe they add value, and that they're complementary to the new volatility trading pauses," said NYSE spokesman Ray Pellecchia.

Trading halts have become popular conversation across the industry thanks to the events of May 6, when the markets gyrated dramatically over a 20-minute span. As trading exploded that afternoon, the NYSE's LRPs were triggered many thousands of times.

But they were triggered to ill effect, according to Jose Marques, global head of electronic equity trading at Deutsche Bank.

The LRPs definitely contributed to the lack of liquidity on May 6, he said, because the NYSE took itself offline at a time when the market was under stress. Other venues were able to route around the NYSE when it switched to a manual mode and was no longer able to participate, he said.

"Having the NYSE with a separate, additional [circuit breaker] ... is really not helpful," Marques said.

Others agree. One competitor of the NYSE who did not want to give his name said he understood why exchanges would want to have their own trading-halt mechanisms to limit volatility in the stocks they list. But he said there can be trouble whenever a halt is issued on one exchange and other markets continue trading. And furthermore, he added, with a marketwide circuit breaker in place, individual trading pause mechanisms aren't necessary.

"I think it's difficult to pause one market and not all markets," he said.

Nomura Research Institute, an affiliate of giant Japanese bank Nomura Securities International, took a look at the repercussions of triggered LRPs on May 6 in its study of the flash crash. It concluded that the triggering of the LRPs coincided with the disappearance of high-frequency traders' buy orders.

"NYSE LRPs are suspected of not only failing to fulfill their intended purpose of stabilizing the market," the NRI wrote, "but having the opposite effect by causing mass rerouting of sell orders to nearly bidless non-NYSE trading venues as high-frequency traders vanished from the market."