Commentary

Tim Quast
Traders Magazine Online News

We're All HFTs Now

In this guest commentary, author Tim Quast looks back at the history of HFT and how the market has evolved to where many firms now fit the definition of high-frequency trader.

Traders Poll

Are you in favor of a pilot program and examination of the rebate system by the SEC?




Free Site Registration

August 11, 2008

New Barbarians at the Gate

Foreign brokers get leg up on U.S. firms under SEC proposal

By Stephen J. Nelson

Also in this article

Traders enjoy complaining about regulation and are justified in doing so. There is hardly any action that a trader can take during the day, no matter how basic, that is not the subject of some regulation. And, with every regulation, there is a cost. We lawyers may commiserate with our clients about regulation, but regulation is good for us.

Heavily regulated industries need lawyers to help decipher their responsibilities and defend them when they run afoul of the regulations. Complex regulation requires smarter and higher-priced lawyers.

As much as traders complain about regulation (and lawyers), however, the truth is that the financial services industry receives one enormous benefit from regulation. Regulation offers a competitive advantage to the regulated. The unregulated are not permitted to play. And that's what raises the importance to the SEC's recent proposed changes to Exchange Act Rule 15a-6. The proposal would permit foreign broker-dealers that are not registered with the SEC to invade turf that currently can only be occupied by registered broker-dealers.

At present, a U.S. person is free to open a foreign brokerage account with a foreign broker-dealer and trade foreign securities. But, the U.S. person has to take the initiative. The foreign broker-dealer cannot advertise its services or provide research to U.S. persons, make sales calls on U.S. persons or do any of the activities that fall within the broad category of "solicitation."

There is a limited exception to all of this for "major U.S. institutional investors," generally defined as investment companies and registered investment advisers with assets under management greater than $100 million. Note that hedge funds with unregistered investment managers are not included in this definition. If a foreign broker-dealer wishes to make a sales call on a major U.S. institutional investor, a U.S. broker-dealer must accompany them. The U.S. broker-dealer must review any research for compliance with U.S. rules. If the solicitation results in an order, that order must be executed through a U.S. broker-dealer, the customer's assets must be in the custody of a U.S. broker-dealer and the assets are subject to U.S. customer protection rules. Finally, any margin must be provided by the U.S. broker-dealer, rather than by the foreign broker-dealer.

The proposed new rule would expand this exemption significantly. First, the exemption for solicitation would apply to just about any company, partnership, trust or high net worth individual with an investment portfolio greater than $25 million. These institutions and high net worth individuals are defined in the rule as "qualified investors." Second, and most importantly for the trading community, the proposed rule would also reduce the role of U.S. broker-dealers in this process.

The proposal divides the world of foreign broker-dealers into two camps: Foreign broker-dealers that conduct a "foreign business" and other foreign broker-dealers. A foreign broker-dealer conducts a "foreign business" if 85 percent of the securities purchased and sold by or on behalf of its clients are "foreign securities."