Momtchil Pojarliev
Traders Magazine Online News

Some Like It Hedged

BNP Asset Management's Pojarliev discusses a variety of options to address foreign currency exposures. Although there is no single best-practice solution for addressing foreign currency exposures, institutional investors have three main choices, he says.

Traders Poll

Amid changes in builder, do you think the CAT project will be completed by 2020?

Free Site Registration

August 14, 2007

SEC Weighs Access to Foreign Marts

By Nina Mehta

Also in this article

  • SEC Weighs Access to Foreign Marts
  • Page 2

After effecting an aggressive face-off among U.S. exchanges, the Securities and Exchange Commission has raised the specter of additional future competition-with exchanges abroad. For the first time in its 73-year history, the SEC is considering regulations that could ease U.S. investors' access to non-U.S. securities products and services through cross-border trading.

"We are looking toward potential action this year on this topic," SEC chairman Christopher Cox said recently.

This is a significant departure from the past. The SEC has historically nixed the idea of foreign-market and brokerage access to U.S. investors. According to Benn Steil, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, this served as a way to protect U.S. exchanges from competition.

"But the world has changed dramatically in the last year, with cross-border mergers among exchanges," Steil said. "There is a lot of pressure on the SEC now to accommodate greater integration of markets." Indeed, Cox in June said cross-border mergers, such as the one that formed NYSE Euronext and the proposed merger between Nasdaq and OMX Group, are part of an industry-wide trend toward cross-border trading.

Discussions are under way at the SEC about the potential structure and benefits of a regulatory "mutual recognition" scheme. Under such a program, the SEC could allow exchanges and broker-dealers registered with foreign regulators that pass muster to gain access to U.S. investors without having to meet the SEC's registration requirements for foreign financial services firms and issuers.

Those exchanges and brokers could be granted exemptions from U.S. registration if the securities laws in their countries are comparable to those in the U.S. and if their regulators have oversight and enforcement powers deemed by the SEC to be sufficiently similar to its own. This would constitute a "system of substituted compliance with SEC regulations," according to a paper by Ethiopis Tafara and Robert J. Peterson, the two executives in the SEC's Office of International Affairs who put together the mutual-recognition framework the commission is now considering.

By and large, the beneficiaries of this regulatory shift would be retail investors, whose access to non-U.S. stocks is currently more limited than that of institutional investors, who can work around existing restrictions by trading through foreign broker-dealers or foreign affiliates of U.S. brokers. But the consequences of mutual recognition are far-reaching, since the proposed access is likely to kick-start global competition between exchanges. That could potentially lead to the global trading of equities.

For U.S. exchanges, the SEC's new openness to foreign-market access raises competitive issues. "Clearly, once you [the SEC] have dropped the bar, or dropped the regulatory standard, you are going to put us at a competitive disadvantage in terms of registration, because this is a way to get around U.S. registration requirements," said Meyer ("Sandy") Frucher, chairman and CEO of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, at a June SEC roundtable on mutual recognition.

If foreign markets gain access to U.S. investors, Frucher said, U.S. exchanges would also want to trade those securities. He added that the SEC would have to "catch up to the marketplace."