Commentary

David Weisberger
Traders Magazine Online News

Stop the BS & Promote Real Transparency!

In this shared blog, David Weisberger says a recent WSJ article is wrong and that traders do need to purchase faster and more comprehensive market data to avoid being fined for violating "Best Execution" obligations.

Traders Poll

Is information leakage a major concern of yours when you trade?



Free Site Registration

October 19, 2006

NASD to Traders: Stop Fish Tales

By Gregory Bresiger

The NASD warned sellside trading desks not to send out inaccurate or misleading indications of interest and/or trade reports via third-party services.

Broker-dealers often transmit such data through several service providers that pass the information to their subscribers.

NASD, which didn't name any brokerages providing inaccurate execution numbers, said firms could use service providers to advertise activity in a security to attract order flow. However, "members are reminded," the NASD wrote, "that, to the extent they use these services to communicate or advertise trading activity or interest, such information must be truthful, accurate and not misleading."

The NASD noted that firms transmitting erroneous data could be in violation of NASD and other securities rules.

Traders have long complained that many indications of interest (IOIs) sent out by brokers did not represent a true trading intent. They have also decried the inflated numbers used when reporting trades. A 30 percent "fudge factor" is not unusual, one trader said.

Thomson (AutEx and Block Data), Bloomberg and Reuters are the primary vendor-distributors of advertised trades and IOIs. None of the vendors was mentioned in the memo.