Commentary

Traders Magazine Online News

Spoofing, Surveillance and Supervision

Jay Biondo, Product Manager - Surveillance at Trading Technologies, co-authored an article along with James Lundy and Nicholas Wendland, both of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, reviewing the CFTC's regulations and expanding efforts, 21st century surveillance and supervision, as well as strategic recommendations.

Traders Poll

Is the adoption of electronic trading in fixed income on par of that in the FX sector?




Free Site Registration

April 1, 2004

An Embarrassing Discovery About Speed and the ECNs

By John A. Byrne

ECNs are not equal execution providers. That's what a new study by a research firm suggests.

Instinet, for instance, offers some of the highest levels of price improvement. Island, which was acquired by Instinet, had the best overall propensity in all markets for price improvement. Attain had the fastest price improvement in the Nasdaq market. Brut offered the lowest implicit execution costs on Amex.

Want the highest levels of price improvement in certain volume among Nasdaq NNM market orders - and at the fastest speed? Nextrade has that. Tradebook, meanwhile, had the greatest certainty of execution among Nasdaq stocks.

These are some of the claims in the study by the research and advisory firm Celent Communications. The study also singles out the average execution speed of ECNs, which it contends, ranges from "impressive to embarrassing."

"Most ECNs execute most of their marketable orders within 10 seconds, and yet some execution speeds of certain marketable orders are as slow as three to five minutes," according to the study, authored by Jodi Burns. The average execution rates on ECNs for marketable orders is 39 percent compared with 83 percent across other market centers, notes the Celent study. The study suggests that ECNs are "great at executing liquid stocks at impressive speeds but they are not the best place to send orders in stocks with small to medium activity levels."