Commentary

David Weisberger
Traders Magazine Online News

Stop the BS & Promote Real Transparency!

In this shared blog, David Weisberger says a recent WSJ article is wrong and that traders do need to purchase faster and more comprehensive market data to avoid being fined for violating "Best Execution" obligations.

Traders Poll

Is information leakage a major concern of yours when you trade?



Free Site Registration

April 30, 1998

Knight & Trimark

By John A. Byrne

The success of Jersey City's Knight Securities, and its affiliated Trimark Securities in White Plains, N.Y., bodes well for a hot initial public offering by the firms' parent. The preliminary prospectus, however, raises important considerations. One is that a large percentage of the company's growth in Nasdaq and third-market trading is due to retail-sized order flow. Narrowing spreads have encouraged the company to penetrate the institutional market.

At the same time, the company has changed its payment-for-order-flow arrangements, paying broker dealers only for orders providing a profit opportunity. Limit orders do not receive rebates. Payment for order flow, in fact, decreased 10.3 percent to $16.3 million for the three months ending March 31, 1998, from $18.1 million for the comparable period in 1997.

In another area, it is possible a top company executive will be suspended from the industry, arising from the Securities and Exchange Commission's three-year Nasdaq probe. The SEC intends to recommend the executive be charged with failure to supervise several transactions executed by traders at another major wholesaler. The executive was employed by that firm before he joined Knight and Trimark in 1995, the prospectus noted.