Commentary

David Weisberger
Traders Magazine Online News

Stop the BS & Promote Real Transparency!

In this shared blog, David Weisberger says a recent WSJ article is wrong and that traders do need to purchase faster and more comprehensive market data to avoid being fined for violating "Best Execution" obligations.

Traders Poll

Is information leakage a major concern of yours when you trade?



Free Site Registration

January 1, 1998

Next Nasdaq

By John A. Byrne

Nasdaq's proposal for an integrated order-delivery and execution system may hinge on market makers quoting all stocks in proprietary trade sizes of 100 shares, that is, in so-called actual sizes. The National Association of Securities Dealers contends that order-size rules for the handling of small orders currently executed on SOES are unnecessary and should be eliminated.

Nasdaq states that if artificial quote-size requirements on all Nasdaq securities are not eliminated ahead of a new integrated order-delivery and execution system, some order-entry features of the facility would not be appropriate. In that case, Nasdaq thinks that order-entry firms should not be permitted to enter trades larger than 1,000 shares. The NASD proposes that if the absence of full implementation of the actual-size rule, non-market makers should not be permitted to enter trades in the new system larger than 1,000 shares on non-preferenced orders.

.